MDX is optimized for common visual patterns like PivotTables in Excel and other reporting applications that target multidimensional business semantics. Historically, reporting applications use MDX (Multidimensional Expressions) as a query language against multidimensional databases. Once data is in this format, the front-end reporting solution can be bolted on top of it (Tableau, SSAS, SSRS, etc).This article describes how Power BI uses DAX (Data Analysis Expressions) queries to report against multidimensional models in SQL Server Analysis Services. The denormalization of the tables helps with reporting by reducing the number of joins you have to do at the cost of duplicating data. Not to the extent that Google does, but still enough to be wary.ĭo yourself a favor and read up on "dimensional modelling" and concepts like fact and dimension tables. I would be concerned that MSFT's multi-dimensional offering (SSAS) will eventually be kind of pushed aside as they've done this with technologies before. You're really asking about the differences in tooling and concepts between tabular and multi-dimensional. OLAP isn't so much a model as it is a mechanism for querying data in a multi-dimensional manner. Here's also a fresh document from MSFT on multidimensional versus tabular. Here's a high-high-level view of these various methods of reporting by SQL Chick. So my question, is what kind of use case would prompt me to use OLAP modelling over tabular? You can then further break that down by adding in the employee name to see each person's "pattern" over the course of time.Īnalytical = aggregated events over time You can display this over time to see that each month has more visits in the last week as opposed to the first week of the month. You take this list and start directing the maintenance and security staff to certain properties.Īnalytical reporting asks, "What events or changes have happened over time, grouped by various attributes?" An example would be a query that produces a set of rows where each event equates to one visit to one foreclosed property. An example would be a query that produces a list of foreclosed properties that haven't been checked-on in X days. Operational is essentially querying the data and using that result set as an input to your workflow. It can also help to view things in two different ways: operational reporting versus analytical reporting. These parts take a few weeks if the data is clean and tiny, months or years if the data is across the enterprise and complex. Where clients and managers have an issue is that all the time saved in querying is actually spent properly modeling the data, writing ETL to conform dimensions and populate facts, and spinning up the reporting solution of SSAS. Even better is that these parameters like $10k, 2014, and 2016 can instantly be changed by clicking a few buttons. These types of queries can instead by manipulated by selecting measures (number of properties pushed to market) and grouping them by dimensions (initial asking price per each $10,000 increment) and also filtering (listed between 20) in a pivot table within Excel. The results eventually get sent back to the client the next day at which point they say, "Cool, but my boss changed his mind and now wants to look at a bigger date range and in a different price range, can you do that?" A SQL report developer has to first take care of their other work, then pound out a complex join on highly normalized tables but only after figuring out the data in each table and dealing with logic issues. Imagine a client wants to see how many properties were listed between date A and B with an initial asking price between Y and Z. The Mage above is very much correct in associating "data exploration" with OLAP as it lets clients that aren't tech-savvy at all "write" queries in the form of pivot tables in Excel and lets them do it quickly.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |